Under the Loper Bright decision, federal courts are now required to apply independent judgment regarding whether federal agencies have acted within their statutory authority, moving away from the previous Chevron deference standard that allowed agencies more interpretative leeway. This change, exemplified in the Corner Post case, facilitates challenges to longstanding regulations and agency decisions, even when statute of limitation issues arise. As a result, the DOL may face increased scrutiny over its interpretations of ERISA, leading to potential challenges to DOL regulations in the ERISA space starting in 2025 and beyond.
A Texas federal judge, Reed O'Connor, ruled that American Airlines violated federal law by directing its employee retirement plans toward investment firms focused on environmental, social, and governance products. This decision marks a significant victory for opponents of progressive investing. The judge found that the airline breached its fiduciary duty of loyalty under ERISA by hiring BlackRock to manage its $26 billion 401k plan. However, he did not find that American Airlines violated its duty of prudence, noting that the airline acted in line with industry practices. The ruling followed a four-day trial initiated by a lawsuit led by pilot Bryan Spence, who contended that American Airlines' choice of BlackRock, which emphasizes political agendas alongside financial returns, was inappropriate.
The IRS has released proposed regulations concerning the SECURE 2.0 Act, specifically focusing on catch-up contributions available to employees aged 50 and older in 401k plans. The regulations detail a requirement that catch-up contributions from certain higher-income participants be designated as after-tax Roth contributions. They also offer guidance for plan administrators on implementing this new Roth catch-up rule, incorporating feedback from comments on a previous notice issued in August 2023. Additionally, the proposed regulations address an increased catch-up contribution limit for specific participants, including those aged 60-63 and employees enrolled in newly established SIMPLE plans.
The IRS has released proposed regulations related to the SECURE 2.0 Act, which includes a mandate for newly established 401k and 403b plans to automatically enroll eligible employees starting in the 2025 plan year. The proposed regulations offer guidance for plan administrators on implementation and will apply to plan years starting more than six months after the final regulations are released. In the interim, administrators must follow a reasonable, good faith interpretation of the statute.
Kimberly-Clark has agreed to a $2.25 million settlement in an ERISA lawsuit concerning excessive fees in the company's 401k plan. The case, Seidner et al. v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. et al., has been ongoing for three years, and the settlement was reached through mediation. The plaintiffs, two former employees, are seeking preliminary court approval for the settlement in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. They chose to settle to avoid the prolonged uncertainty of litigation and potential appeals, acknowledging that the settlement represents only about 15% of the estimated overall losses suffered by plan participants due to mismanagement of the retirement plan.
Congress has historically provided optional disaster relief for retirement plan sponsors to assist participants in accessing funds during natural disasters, but this assistance often arrived too late. The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 addresses this issue by establishing automatic and permanent disaster relief that becomes effective immediately upon the declaration of a "major disaster" by FEMA. This relief is retroactive to January 26, 2021, aiming to streamline the previous ad hoc assistance. In May 2024, the IRS released a FAQ page to offer additional guidance to plan sponsors regarding this provision. This article in the Journal of Pension Benefits discusses the SECURE 2.0 disaster relief and the IRS's related guidance.
The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear the case Cunningham v. Cornell University, which addresses a disagreement among circuit courts regarding whether a plaintiff must demonstrate more than just the occurrence of a "prohibited transaction" to survive a motion to dismiss. Several retirement industry groups, including the ERISA Industry Committee, the American Benefits Council, and the SPARK Institute, have filed an amicus brief supporting the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling. This ruling asserts that simply identifying a "prohibited transaction" is not enough for a lawsuit to proceed; plaintiffs must also claim that applicable statutory exemptions do not apply.
A lawsuit against Prudential regarding its GoalMaker-managed account platform has been dismissed. The suit, initiated in September 2022, alleged that Prudential's fiduciaries improperly filled the 401k plan with proprietary mutual funds, neglected to monitor their performance, and failed to disclose recordkeeping fees. This allegedly led to excessive fees being paid to Prudential and significant losses for the plan and its approximately 45,000 participants.
To subscribe to our free weekly newsletter, enter your email address below then click the "Join" button.
NOTE: WE DO NOT SELL YOUR DATA OR EMAIL ADDRESS TO ANY ORGANIZATION.
Collected Wisdom™
Our researchers look for what they think are some of the better resources available to assist you in administering your plan or helping your clients. We group these resources in our COLLECTED WISDOM™ topics to make it easy for you to locate the information you need. Each item in a category contains a summary and date of when it was placed in the group.
We also maintain some older material in these collections for perspective and context.
